Timeline for What to do when OP's edit/clarification invalidates existing answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 9:10 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://ell.stackexchange.com/ with https://ell.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 15, 2013 at 10:23 | answer | added | Arun | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 14, 2013 at 15:50 | comment | added | J.R. Mod | As a side note, this highlights one of the reasons a moderator will put a vague question immediately on hold. Sometimes people see that action, and think, "Aw, c'mon! Aren't we getting a little trigger happy here?" But "on hold" means just that – on hold. Nobody is censuring the O.P., but instead we are saying, "Let's figure out what you're asking, before the community takes this into ten different directions, with none of them addressing your actual question." | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 20:21 | answer | added | Howard Pautz | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 17:51 | answer | added | WendiKiddMod | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 14:35 | history | asked | FumbleFingers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |