Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 8, 2022 at 16:23 history edited Mari-Lou A CC BY-SA 4.0
typos and formatting
Sep 6, 2022 at 16:03 comment added Mari-Lou A @DialFrost re. a recent edit: correct attribution is not embedding a naked link under the name "source". We need to know the name of the publication / book / website/ newspaper, and when possible, the author. Links rot, sites change names and locations, even well-known dictionaries have been known to shut down. Just having "source" is not an improvement on a naked, albeit aesthetically ugly, link.
Sep 6, 2022 at 14:29 comment added David Siegel Mod @DialFrost I was thinking of the initial question and responses as the first phase, not so labeled because I didn't know there would be a 2nd. As dor levels, they sare still very vague, no one but me has even agreed that there should be any, much less where the boundaries night be. But you are surely not a new user on ELL.
Sep 6, 2022 at 1:46 comment added DialFrost Quick question, why is it called 2nd phase if there isnt a 1st phase? And what category would I fall under? Maybe somewhat experienced?
Sep 6, 2022 at 1:45 history edited DialFrost CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 2 characters in body
Sep 6, 2022 at 0:37 history edited David SiegelMod CC BY-SA 4.0
Second Phase
Aug 27, 2022 at 10:33 comment added DialFrost Oh :(, you only missed out a few characters that MarcInManhattan fixed :P So you're fine!
Aug 27, 2022 at 9:58 comment added David Siegel Mod @DialFrost thanks for the pointer -- I never use a mobile for Stack Exchange.. I have always been a poor typist, but in recent years I have developed vision problems which make it much worse. Sorry for any problems this causes others.
Aug 27, 2022 at 3:35 comment added DialFrost Btw @DavidSiegel my recent meta post (Are you a mobile user, your spelling is really off sometimes :P)
Aug 25, 2022 at 16:40 comment added David Siegel Mod I just added "Marking and Attributing Examples, Sources, and Other Quotes" to the "Contributor's Guide".
Aug 25, 2022 at 15:01 answer added Mari-Lou A timeline score: 4
Aug 25, 2022 at 15:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackEnglishLL/status/1562817090922242050
Aug 25, 2022 at 14:26 comment added Mari-Lou A For repeated offences, I would think locking or closing a post is a preferable option than deletion. New users should rightly be given some slack and guidance. But when a user, who's been a member for almost three years, believes that it is up to respondents to do the research and I quote: “I mean if you need to google it anyway why bother". Well...
Aug 25, 2022 at 5:14 history became hot meta post
Aug 25, 2022 at 4:53 answer added MarcInManhattan timeline score: 3
Aug 25, 2022 at 4:35 answer added gotubeMod timeline score: 1
Aug 25, 2022 at 3:27 comment added Laurel Mod Absolutely agree that something needs to be done. This type of thing has been on my mind for a while. (I even helped make it clear in the Help Center that questions need attribution too).
Aug 25, 2022 at 3:01 history edited MarcInManhattan CC BY-SA 4.0
Fixed several minor issues (mostly typos).
Aug 25, 2022 at 2:46 history edited LaurelMod CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 1 character in body
Aug 25, 2022 at 0:14 history asked David SiegelMod CC BY-SA 4.0