#TL;DR I believe the opposite side has a point, while reaching the wrong conclusion. So I take all of the sides into account. We're going to

#Reasoning

##A clearer view on the dilemma

##Solutions

###Doing nothing

###Clarifying grammar's scope

###Burninating grammar

##So, what to do?

TL;DR

I believe the opposite side has a point, while reaching the wrong conclusion. So I take all of the sides into account. We're going to

Reasoning

A clearer view on the dilemma

Solutions

Doing nothing

Clarifying grammar's scope

Burninating grammar

So, what to do?

The question that we're going to leave the only instance of the tag is this one. I humbly request contributing answers supported by citable sources to the question.

A proposed solution would be to heed this nice guy when he said @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Somebody write a self-answered question on "What do we mean by 'grammar'?" put the grammar tag on that. As a result, I created the post What is meant by "grammar"? and now we're eagerly waiting for your answers on it!

The question that we're going to leave the only instance of the tag is this one. I humbly request contributing answers supported by citable sources to the question.

A proposed solution would be to heed this nice guy when he said @inɒzɘmɒЯ.A.M Somebody write a self-answered question on "What do we mean by 'grammar'?" put the grammar tag on that. As a result, I created the post What is meant by "grammar"? and now we're eagerly waiting for your answers on it!

This is the follow-up of http://meta.ell.stackexchange.com/questions/2699/is-this-tag-useful-episode-1-the-big-boss-grammar. (i.e. intended to be the community decision on the matter, if people agree with the sentiments of this meta post)

#TL;DR I believe the opposite side has a point, while reaching the wrong conclusion. So I take all of the sides into account. We're going to

1. Edit every post with grammar and replace the tag with something actually useful.
2. Leave the tag on only one question, so it works as a temporary tag. We should — and hopefully will — edit every new question with a grammar (mis)tag.

It was not terribly clear what tags were meant to be on ELL. Bad tags popped up that wouldn't have so in other SEs. I can count a few possible reasons:

So, over the time, people left grammar alone because why does it hurt to have that tag? However, as explained in my former meta post, it horribly fails the criteria of a good SE tag.

IMO, it will most probably fail. The advantage of clarifying grammar would be that askers on ELL won't be hard-pressed to find a tag for their question. The disadvantage, however, would be that we'd still have a "default" tag for many of the askers. The way grammar is currently being used is precisely the way a hypothetical ell-question would've been (the advice in this answer is imprecise and incorrect and unfortunately definitely not researched).

This is the follow-up of Is This Tag Useful? Episode 1 - The Big Boss (grammar). (i.e. intended to be the community decision on the matter, if people agree with the sentiments of this meta post)

#TL;DR I believe the opposite side has a point, while reaching the wrong conclusion. So I take all of the sides into account. We're going to

1. Edit every post with grammar and replace the tag with something actually useful.
2. Leave the tag on only one question, so it works as a temporary tag. We should — and hopefully will — edit every new question with a grammar (mis)tag.

It was not terribly clear what tags were meant to be on ELL. Bad tags popped up that wouldn't have so in other SEs. I can count a few possible reasons:

So, over the time, people left grammar alone because why does it hurt to have that tag? However, as explained in my former meta post, it horribly fails the criteria of a good SE tag.

IMO, it will most probably fail. The advantage of clarifying grammar would be that askers on ELL won't be hard-pressed to find a tag for their question. The disadvantage, however, would be that we'd still have a "default" tag for many of the askers. The way grammar is currently being used is precisely the way a hypothetical ell-question would've been (the advice in this answer is imprecise and incorrect and unfortunately definitely not researched).