Few days ago, I edited this question.
The original post looks like this:
Can we omit the subject and object at the same time?
example:
1 Although he is hurt by her, he still loves her. (nothing omitted)
2 Although hurt by her, he still loves her. (subject omitted only)
3 Although he is hurt, he still loves her. (object omitted only)
4 Although hurt, he still loves her. (subject and object omitted )
I was taught about dropping the subject, but never know something about dropping the object, so I wonder which we should omit in priority, or if we should omit them at the same time, when the main clause and the dependent clause have the same subject and object.
Thank you in advance
And I edited it to make it look like this:
Can we omit the subject and object at the same time?
Example:
Although he is hurt by her, he still loves her. (nothing omitted)
Although hurt by her, he still loves her. (subject omitted only)
Although he is hurt, he still loves her. (object omitted only)
Although hurt, he still loves her. (subject and object omitted )
I was taught about dropping the subject, but never know something about dropping the object, so I wonder which we should omit in priority, or if we should omit them at the same time, when the main clause and the dependent clause have the same subject and object.
I capitalized "example", as it's the first word in the sentence, I also added quotes to the examples the OP provided, and made it number-listed. Finally, I deleted the "thank you in advance", according to this page:
Do not use signature, taglines, greetings, thanks, or other chitchat." You can click into the link. "If you use signatures, taglines, greetings, thanks, or other chitchat, they will be removed to reduce noise in the questions and answers.
According to the page about editing in the help center:
When should I edit posts?
Any time you see a post that needs improvement and are inclined to suggest an edit, you are welcome to do so.
Some common reasons to edit a post are:
- To fix grammatical or spelling mistakes
- To clarify the meaning of the post (without changing that meaning)
- To include additional information only found in comments, so that all of the information relevant to the post is contained in one place
- To correct minor mistakes or add updates as the post ages
- To add related resources or hyperlinks
Tiny, trivial edits are discouraged; try to make the post significantly better when you edit, correcting all problems that you observe.
In my edit, I improved the formatting and appearance of the post, and corrected minor mistakes, I also deleted the "thank you in advance" to reduce noise and useless information. I didn't change the original meaning or make the post worse as well. However, my post was rejected. It seems that I can't see who rejected my post, whether it's the OP or other users. I think that my edit shouldn't be rejected, so I'm writing this question to ask about whether my edit is actually unnecessary or it should be accepted.