(noun) a social butterfly /queen
Two reviewers rejected it with the following reason:
- This edit was intended to address the author of the post and makes no sense as an edit. It should have been written as a comment or an answer.
- The edit does not improve the quality of the post. Changes to the content are unnecessary or make the post more confusing.
The question is about which words to use, and my edit in bold supplements the answer with a new usage. I don't see in any means this is 'intended to address the author of the post', and 'does not improve the quality of the post'. I agree that this tiny change is 'unnecessary' since the original answer is abundant, however, I think it is beneficial to enrich it.