I am very confused to see that there are many online dictionaries out there that shows pronunciations with phoneme symbols but not strictly IPA.

For example, for the word 'entail', the pronunciation given in most dictionaries is /ɪnteɪl/, yet pronounce it as /enteil/. On the other hand, another dictionary gave /enteil/ as pronunciation (not in phonemes) but pronounced the word as /ɪnteɪl/.

Another similar confusion was regarding /æ/ sound.

So, is there an online dictionary that shows pronunciation strictly in IPA?

  • 1
    /ɪnteɪl/ and /enteɪl/ are both IPA-ised. It's just that different dictionaries use different symbols. Also depends on the variety of English. I would however suggest you don't use dictionaries for IPA; they're quite inconsistent. Learn IPA (you can download the handbook of the IPA from my profile page), and use your ears.
    – Void
    Feb 5, 2021 at 3:43
  • Phonemic writing is sometimes subjective because a) it does not does not always describe how something is pronounced in a particular context and b) for most people, the way the brain interprets phonemes varies depending on the listener's own accent. Phonetic writing is more accurate because it records more detail, but this requires a higher level of training.
    – JavaLatte
    Feb 5, 2021 at 3:54

1 Answer 1


Merriam-Webster, which you link to, doesn't use IPA. (Its learner's dictionary does, though.)

Lexico, Cambridge and Collins use IPA - although if you use Lexico's US edition then it gives two transcriptions for each pronunciation, one IPA and the other non-IPA. (Lexico's UK dictionary uses IPA only.)

Lexico has two pronunciations of "entail": /ɪnˈteɪl/ and /ɛnˈteɪl/. This reflects the fact that both are valid pronunciations and different people pronounce it differently - although you should not rely on dictionaries to specify all the valid pronunciations.

Cambridge has /ɪnˈteɪl/, and Collins again /ɪnˈteɪl/.

What do you mean by "strict IPA"? Dictionaries generally use phonemic transcriptions rather than phonetic ones.

Apart from the fact that there are sometimes multiple valid pronunciations, you will sometimes notice different phonemic transcriptions even of (British) Received Pronunciation. For example, Lexico has /bɛt/ for "bet", whereas Cambridge has /bet/. These differences are systematic and deliberate.

John Wells has described the difference between the two schemes: "This hard-won uniformity was shaken, however, by Clive Upton's appointment as pronunciation consultant for Oxford's native-speaker dictionaries. His scheme, adopted by the influential Concise Oxford Dictionary (1995) remains quantitative-qualitative, but differs from the standard scheme in the symbolization of five vowels."

So the vowel that was traditionally transcribed /e/ became /ɛ/ in Upton's scheme (and thus in Oxford dictionaries and in Lexico). And there are similar differences for other vowels.

The transcription is still IPA and is still phonemic. It is simply an alternative choice of vowel symbols to represent those phonemes. You can argue which one is better or worse (Wells largely favours the older system: "In at least some of the cases one can see what motivated Upton to alter the standard symbol: but in my view the supposed gains did not make up for the sacrifice of an agreed standard").


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .