I'm referring to this suggestion.
Two reviewers rejected it with the following reason:
This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability.
One reviewer approved it.
I want to know the thought process that goes behind when reviewing such edit suggestions? AFAIK, I just tried to remove useless text from the question without harming readability or modifying something from what the author of the question intended.