It sometimes occurs to me that text-decoration: none
makes the edit link difficult for some visitors hard to identify. On more than one occasion, a comment pointing out the link has resulted in a better question.
As I type: Do the sentences have the same meaning?
(EDIT: Not an exemplary outcome, but proof of concept at least.)
Is it fair to assume that there are many unreported instances of this event? That is to say, I assume that there are many instances in which the poster, without prompting, fails to expand or edit her question (in response to a comment, for instance) only because she doesn't recognize the grey links below her answer.
Obviously, this is more likely to be a problem for those at the very beginning of their study. Would not an obvious and unmistakeably buttonish element increase the number of edits by questioners?
text-decoration
or lack thereof, but because generally there are so many things to click in SE UI that makes it confusing for newer users of the system. ELL's askers being nonnative English speakers, I guess they'd have a bigger problem finding out how to edit. On Chemistry, whenever we ask the OP to edit their post, we leave an[edit]
in our comment so they click on it. [ . . . ]