I just saw a question with a peculiarly meta title; when I looked at it, it seemed normal enough for the most part, except the title. Turns out, a high-rep user had rewritten just the title to describe the way the question was bad.

That uh. That don't fill me with joy. Is this a thing we should be doing? (I would rollback except I seemingly can't, and I'm not entirely sure this is ♦ flag fodder.)

| |
  • As a side note, you can rollback if you have 2k rep. – M.A.R. May 2 '15 at 19:55
  • @MARamezani: Hmm, I thought rollbacks were available before. Maybe just for your own posts or something. – Nathan Tuggy May 2 '15 at 20:03
  • Yes...You can rollback your posts at anytime (aka without rep requirements)...iirc. – M.A.R. May 2 '15 at 20:04

Yeah, that's not really acceptable behavior. It amounts to vandalism, and if it were a suggested edit, I'd have rejected it.

I've rolled back the edit. If the problem persists, rather than roll back again, one of us can flag for moderator attention.

| |
  • 3
    Thanks for fixing this. As a footnote, it's also okay to flag vandalism, so the O.P. could have flagged this as well. – J.R. May 3 '15 at 1:12
  • @J.R. OK, I'll keep that in mind. – Nathan Tuggy May 4 '15 at 15:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .