Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

There is a list of resourceslist of resources, including dictionariesdictionaries, on English Language and Usage Meta that you may find helpful.

To answer your question about Wiktionary: as long as the definition is accurate, I wouldn't criticize or downvote an answer for citing this source. However, in general I think other dictionaries are perceived as more authoritative, so for any definition that seems like it might be controversial, I would seek another source.

There is a list of resources, including dictionaries, on English Language and Usage Meta that you may find helpful.

To answer your question about Wiktionary: as long as the definition is accurate, I wouldn't criticize or downvote an answer for citing this source. However, in general I think other dictionaries are perceived as more authoritative, so for any definition that seems like it might be controversial, I would seek another source.

There is a list of resources, including dictionaries, on English Language and Usage Meta that you may find helpful.

To answer your question about Wiktionary: as long as the definition is accurate, I wouldn't criticize or downvote an answer for citing this source. However, in general I think other dictionaries are perceived as more authoritative, so for any definition that seems like it might be controversial, I would seek another source.

Source Link
sumelic
  • 7.4k
  • 9
  • 8

There is a list of resources, including dictionaries, on English Language and Usage Meta that you may find helpful.

To answer your question about Wiktionary: as long as the definition is accurate, I wouldn't criticize or downvote an answer for citing this source. However, in general I think other dictionaries are perceived as more authoritative, so for any definition that seems like it might be controversial, I would seek another source.