Timeline for Lack of Accepted Answers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2014 at 6:14 | comment | added | jimsug | @snail, well in general, I'm thinking more that they've never accepted an answer, so they don't accept answers (because they don't know how to, that they should, or that they can). I'd have to look at what meatie has been doing. | |
| Jul 31, 2014 at 22:53 | comment | added | user230 | @jimsug To be specific, meatie has asked about a hundred questions and never accepted any answers. It's unlikely that meatie is forgetting or waiting for more answers. | |
| Jul 31, 2014 at 20:46 | comment | added | jimsug | Well, does the site tell you to accept answers every time? I would say that someone with a history of not accepting answers means it's more likely they'll do so again, not less. | |
| Jul 31, 2014 at 14:49 | comment | added | fluffy | How can you forget to accept an answer every single time? And also when you ask a new question you forget that the previous 100 do not have accepted answers? | |
| Jul 31, 2014 at 14:11 | comment | added | jimsug | I agree with you in principle, but I would suggest that what is happening is that people are waiting for more answers, then forgetting to accept one. I don't think anyone is deliberately failing to accept answers, except for those who may not be aware of this function. | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 10:41 | history | answered | fluffy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |